When Does Dr Check if Baby Is Head Down
(Natural News) A shocking new written report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their kickoff or 2nd trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous ballgame charge per unit, killing 4 out of v unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is self-axiomatic from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-nineteen Vaccine Condom in Pregnant Persons." Just every bit disturbing equally the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth most vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their ain calculations.
Originally brought to our attending by a Life Site News article, we checked with our ain scientific discipline contacts to review the information and double bank check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:
- Yep, the report shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their start or 2nd trimesters.
- Yep, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring fault that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this report was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safety. Only the study data really show quite the oppose.
Hither'southward how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester
Tabular array iv from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their start vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their beginning or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print beneath the table to see this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated equally "spontaneous abortions" in the table.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to annotation that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and non spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could non have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their 3rd trimester, by definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Put another way, information technology is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the beginning twenty weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the offset twenty weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous ballgame rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand flim-flam to make information technology announced that vaccines are prophylactic for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more four out of 5 unborn babies in the beginning twenty weeks of gestation, at to the lowest degree in this information ready. (It'southward a small set of 127 pregnant women, and so we'd like to run across a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in guild to get a more than clear picture show.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A elementary way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of l lemons and fifty limes, with a science report asking the question, "What percent of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellowish fruit and achieve the number l. They mistakenly separate 50 into 100 considering there are 100 total slice of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are yellowish" because it'southward 50/100.
But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't mayhap be included considering they're limes, not lemons. And then the correct math is 50/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the right answer.
In this scientific discipline newspaper, they are using 827 equally the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long by the time window during which a "spontaneous ballgame" can occur. And since pregnant women aren't fourth dimension travelers, they can't go back in time and study a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either can't exercise this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the globe with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "scientific discipline" has already failed its core promise: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the world around u.s..
Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the showtime twenty weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.half-dozen%. Why? Because they're covering upwardly the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, about likely.
In fact, the key writer of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is likewise named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the aforementioned fault in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no meaning risk of adverse events? For instance, here's another written report he co-authored: "Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Agin Consequence Reporting Arrangement (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected rubber concerns after TIV-ID."
Merely is that conclusion based on bad math, similar the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We phone call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Possibly this same study builder has fabricated the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't exist the first time i author was plant to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Albeit to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, past pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We tin't just accept bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.
Spike poly peptide injections into significant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the mean time, it'south clear that four out of 5 pregnancies are existence terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the kickoff xx weeks (at to the lowest degree, according to the pocket-size data set we accept and then far). And that ways the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly every bit globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) bear witness that covid vaccine fasten proteins directly assail reproductive organs such equally the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with man cells, information technology should exist no surprise any that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine proficient and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this equally a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this means that live births may plummet by 3.2 million over the next yr, in the U.s.a. alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."
The fields of medicine and science accept turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike poly peptide bioweapons that are causing strokes, eye attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-built-in babies are their enemy. Joe Biden'south land direction czar in one case characterized human children as an "ecology hazard."
This is a state of war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual expose of the entire human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a want to help humanity, but are now clearly shown to exist working towards humanity'south devastation.
Learn more in today's mind-opening State of affairs Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://world wide web.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html
0 Response to "When Does Dr Check if Baby Is Head Down"
Post a Comment